by COKE_MAN » Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:56 pm
Ok, WR's method worked just fine. Thanks
@Kraada: Are you saying that's why the in between filters won't work here? I think I see what you mean in that if I bet, one player 2bets, and another player 3bets, then I would face a 3bet and not a 2bet so the filter would not catch it. However, throwing out the cases like that, why would it not work when there is only one raise (2bet)? Is it just a semantics thing? To me, "NOT facing a 2bet between .01 and 200bb" means that I faced a 2bet of 0bb (ignoring the upper bound) and since a 2bet of 0bb is not possible, that equates to no 2bet. I can, however, see that the action filter probably looks for actions flagged as a 2bet and then applies the between filter. So, in that case, it will look for 2bets and then for the amounts and since there are no 0bb 2bets in the database, it returns no records. If that is the case then I would say it is working as expected. Now that I type all that out, if this is in fact how it works, then I will say that my original thinking was incorrect and the current implementation makes more sense.