bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Questions and discussion about PokerTracker 4 for Windows

Moderators: WhiteRider, kraada, Flag_Hippo, morny, Moderators

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby marvin » Tue May 08, 2012 7:44 pm

1) then in PT4 the move Limp-squeeze is not possible? (why in PT3 it was possible like i can see by this hand, where hero had chance to squeeze filtering PT3)
GAME #1848098834: Texas Hold'em NL $0.10/$0.20 2009-09-18 12:58:43
Table Devil ray (Beginner)
Seat 1: chavko86 ($22.78 in chips)
Seat 3: anlany ($26.41 in chips) DEALER
Seat 5: 1THOR111 ($27.94 in chips)
Seat 6: morenabr ($38.17 in chips)
Seat 8: gtyu3 ($21.15 in chips)
Seat 10: KiddSTAR1 ($19.75 in chips)
1THOR111: Post SB $0.10
morenabr: Post BB $0.20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gtyu3 [SA DA]
gtyu3: Call $0.20
KiddSTAR1: Fold
chavko86: Fold
anlany: Raise (NF) $0.40
1THOR111: Fold
morenabr: Call $0.20
gtyu3: Raise (NF) $1.60
anlany: Call $1.20
morenabr: Fold
*** FLOP *** [C9 D9 H4]
gtyu3: Check
anlany: Check
*** TURN *** [C3]
gtyu3: Bet $3.20
anlany: Raise (NF) $6.40
gtyu3: Raise (NF) $10.20
anlany: Fold
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $19.48 Rake $0.82
gtyu3: wins $19.48

2) i have written this hand (i hope correctly) why i wish know if the first limper is squeezed in PT3 and PT4 (i dont have found a hand like that in my DB).
from ipoker network, in this hand in pt3 the limper facing squeeze:
GAME #180444022: Texas Hold'em NL $0.25/$0.50 2009-08-28 21:05:41
Table Mono
Seat 1: BENNY1371 ($44.92 in chips)
Seat 2: gtyu3 ($62.58 in chips)
Seat 3: TOYOTA0102 ($9.94 in chips)
Seat 4: IluvRosariDawson ($6.76 in chips)
Seat 5: kazarr ($33.28 in chips)
Seat 6: MnTkr ($7.50 in chips) DEALER
Seat 8: ercancinal ($8.75 in chips)
Seat 9: PaulMcGreg ($10.00 in chips)
Seat 10: Wytvc ($54.37 in chips)
ercancinal: Post SB $0.25
PaulMcGreg: Post BB $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gtyu3 [C8 C9]
Wytvc: Call $0.50
BENNY1371: Raise (NF) $2.00
gtyu3: Call $2.00
TOYOTA0102: Raise (NF) $4.00
IluvRosariDawson: Fold
kazarr: Fold
MnTkr: Fold
ercancinal: Fold
PaulMcGreg: Fold
Wytvc: Fold
BENNY1371: Fold
gtyu3: Fold

*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $8.75 Rake $0.00
TOYOTA0102: wins $8.75
----
3) at the moment how can i see, PT4 uses different definition from PT3. the definition will be uniformed or PT4 will continue with this definition?
marvin
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:17 am

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby WhiteRider » Wed May 09, 2012 3:32 am

1) Apologies - that hand counts as a squeeze in both PT3 and PT4.

2) Wytvc is not squeezed in either PT3 or PT4.

All of the squeeze fields in the database are the same for all players in both of your hands.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54025
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby marvin » Wed May 09, 2012 5:34 pm

then you must only correct the definition of squeeze, make allowed the limp-squeeze in PT4. while in both (PT3 and PT4, limper that have to play after a squeeze arent squeezed (if they hadnt limped-called the OR).
only 1 thing is not clear. if OR call the squeeze, the Cold caller now is facing yet the squeeze? i think that in PT3 the answere was yes like you can see on the hand of Postby marvin » 07 May 2012 14:51
(in PT4 def i have read that no squeeze why or didnt fold before him, but i dont think is correct... can you verifiy pls?
marvin
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:17 am

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby marvin » Wed May 09, 2012 5:57 pm

for being more clear, in the hand of my post of 07 May 2012 14:51, gtyu faced squeeze in PT3, also if other player called before him. can you verify in PT4 how it is seen?
marvin
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:17 am

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby WhiteRider » Thu May 10, 2012 3:58 am

As long as no-one 4Bets everyone who 2Bet or called the 2Bet faces the squeeze, regardless of whether other players before them call or fold.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54025
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby marvin » Thu May 10, 2012 5:07 am

conclusions:
A limp, B Raise, C CCPF, D 3bet (sqeeze), E call (he call a 3bet but not a squeeze why it is his first move), A call (he call a 3bet but not a squeeze why didnt raised or called the 1st raise), B anc C are facing the squeeze.
:ugeek: :D
marvin
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:17 am

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby kraada » Thu May 10, 2012 9:17 am

Once that 3bet is called nobody else can face a squeeze later in the hand. The squeeze move has been defused.
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54430
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby marvin » Fri May 11, 2012 3:34 am

Post by kraada » 10 May 2012 09:17
Once that 3bet is called nobody else can face a squeeze later in the hand. The squeeze move has been defused.
BUT....
Post by WhiteRider » 10 May 2012 03:58
As long as no-one 4Bets everyone who 2Bet or called the 2Bet faces the squeeze, regardless of whether other players before them call or fold.

IN PT3 is like WR says. im sure about why in teh hand that i post in this thread ( » 07 May 2012 14:51 ) , gtyu3 faces squeeze also if there are 2 players that has called the 3bet before him.
in PT4 are correct krada's words or WR's words???????? :?: :ugeek: :geek: :oops: :?
marvin
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:17 am

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby WhiteRider » Fri May 11, 2012 4:36 am

I based my answer on the values in the database - I haven't had confirmation from the development team yet.
The database fields match between PT3 and PT4.
WhiteRider
Moderator
 
Posts: 54025
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:06 pm
Location: UK

Re: bugs on stats and doubt on definition

Postby kraada » Fri May 11, 2012 8:42 am

If WhiteRider tested this in the database, he's certainly right - I'm pretty sure I went based on my recollection which, on more than one occasion, has been proven wrong :)
kraada
Moderator
 
Posts: 54430
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:32 am
Location: NY

PreviousNext

Return to PokerTracker 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests