1) then in PT4 the move Limp-squeeze is not possible? (why in PT3 it was possible like i can see by this hand, where hero had chance to squeeze filtering PT3)
GAME #1848098834: Texas Hold'em NL $0.10/$0.20 2009-09-18 12:58:43
Table Devil ray (Beginner)
Seat 1: chavko86 ($22.78 in chips)
Seat 3: anlany ($26.41 in chips) DEALER
Seat 5: 1THOR111 ($27.94 in chips)
Seat 6: morenabr ($38.17 in chips)
Seat 8: gtyu3 ($21.15 in chips)
Seat 10: KiddSTAR1 ($19.75 in chips)
1THOR111: Post SB $0.10
morenabr: Post BB $0.20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gtyu3 [SA DA]
gtyu3: Call $0.20
KiddSTAR1: Fold
chavko86: Fold
anlany: Raise (NF) $0.40
1THOR111: Fold
morenabr: Call $0.20
gtyu3: Raise (NF) $1.60
anlany: Call $1.20
morenabr: Fold
*** FLOP *** [C9 D9 H4]
gtyu3: Check
anlany: Check
*** TURN *** [C3]
gtyu3: Bet $3.20
anlany: Raise (NF) $6.40
gtyu3: Raise (NF) $10.20
anlany: Fold
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $19.48 Rake $0.82
gtyu3: wins $19.48
2) i have written this hand (i hope correctly) why i wish know if the first limper is squeezed in PT3 and PT4 (i dont have found a hand like that in my DB).
from ipoker network, in this hand in pt3 the limper facing squeeze:
GAME #180444022: Texas Hold'em NL $0.25/$0.50 2009-08-28 21:05:41
Table Mono
Seat 1: BENNY1371 ($44.92 in chips)
Seat 2: gtyu3 ($62.58 in chips)
Seat 3: TOYOTA0102 ($9.94 in chips)
Seat 4: IluvRosariDawson ($6.76 in chips)
Seat 5: kazarr ($33.28 in chips)
Seat 6: MnTkr ($7.50 in chips) DEALER
Seat 8: ercancinal ($8.75 in chips)
Seat 9: PaulMcGreg ($10.00 in chips)
Seat 10: Wytvc ($54.37 in chips)
ercancinal: Post SB $0.25
PaulMcGreg: Post BB $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to gtyu3 [C8 C9]
Wytvc: Call $0.50
BENNY1371: Raise (NF) $2.00
gtyu3: Call $2.00
TOYOTA0102: Raise (NF) $4.00
IluvRosariDawson: Fold
kazarr: Fold
MnTkr: Fold
ercancinal: Fold
PaulMcGreg: Fold
Wytvc: Fold
BENNY1371: Fold
gtyu3: Fold
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $8.75 Rake $0.00
TOYOTA0102: wins $8.75
----
3) at the moment how can i see, PT4 uses different definition from PT3. the definition will be uniformed or PT4 will continue with this definition?
